Why Your Doctor Says You’re ‘Fine’ — But You Still Feel Terrible
Author: Rohan Smith | Functional Medicine Practitioner | Adelaide, SA
Quick Answer
Why you still feel terrible despite normal tests is one of the most common frustrations in clinical care today. Many people continue to experience fatigue, brain fog, pain, sleep issues, digestive symptoms, or mood imbalances even after being told their blood work is “normal.” Standard panels like TSH, cholesterol, or basic hormone tests may not capture underlying metabolic dysfunction, nutrient imbalances, immune dysregulation, or chronic inflammation — all of which can affect how you feel regardless of how the numbers look. In this article, we explore common hidden factors that contribute to persistent symptoms and why traditional testing may not tell the full story.
The Core Problem: “Normal” Does Not Mean Optimal
Many people feel dismissed after repeated medical visits where test results are reported as normal despite ongoing symptoms. This disconnect is common and typically reflects a limitation of reference ranges rather than imaginary or psychological causes.
Laboratory reference ranges are usually calculated using population averages that include both healthy individuals and those with early or subclinical disease (1). Falling within that range simply means overt disease has not been detected — not that physiology is functioning at an optimal level.
Example: Thyroid Function
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is often used as the sole marker of thyroid health. While many laboratories define normal TSH as up to 4.0–5.0 mIU/L, multiple studies suggest that symptom-free individuals tend to cluster between approximately 1.0–2.0 mIU/L (2–4).
A TSH of 3.5 mIU/L may therefore be labelled “normal” yet still be associated with fatigue, cold intolerance, weight gain, or cognitive slowing — a pattern often referred to as subclinical thyroid dysfunction (5).
What Standard Testing Commonly Misses
Typical GP blood panels assess around 10–15 markers and are primarily designed to screen for organ failure or advanced disease rather than functional efficiency. Several key physiological systems are often under-investigated, including:
- Gastrointestinal and microbiome health
- Stress-hormone rhythm and signalling
- Nutrient-dependent metabolic pathways
- Neuroimmune and inflammatory regulation
Gut Health
The gut microbiome plays a central role in immune regulation, nutrient absorption, and neurotransmitter signalling. Approximately 90% of serotonin is produced in the gastrointestinal tract, influencing mood, sleep, and stress tolerance (6–8). Gut microbiome imbalance and intestinal inflammation are not detected through routine blood testing.
Cortisol Rhythm
Cortisol is a stress hormone with a diurnal (daily) rhythm, normally peaking in the morning and gradually declining toward night. Disruption of this rhythm has been associated with fatigue, sleep disturbance, mood changes, and reduced stress resilience (9,10). Single serum cortisol measurements do not capture this dynamic pattern.
Methylation Pathways
Methylation refers to a group of biochemical reactions involved in detoxification, neurotransmitter metabolism, DNA regulation, and hormone clearance. Methylation pathways may function inefficiently in some individuals, contributing to fatigue, poor stress tolerance, and hormonal symptoms, yet they are not directly assessed in standard pathology testing (11,12).
The Functional Medicine Difference
Functional medicine testing aims to assess how well systems are functioning, rather than simply determining whether disease is present.
- DUTCH hormone testing evaluates hormone metabolites and cortisol rhythm instead of relying on single static values, offering insight into hormone processing and stress physiology (13).
- Organic Acids Testing (OAT) can identify functional nutrient deficiencies, mitochondrial energy markers, neurotransmitter metabolites, and microbial by-products that are not visible on standard blood work (14–16).
- Comprehensive stool and microbiome testing can assess digestion, inflammation, microbial balance, and immune signalling within the gut (17).
These tools are not used in isolation to diagnose disease, but to identify patterns of dysfunction that may help explain persistent or unexplained symptoms.
Interpreting Existing Blood Tests Differently
In many cases, valuable information already exists within previous GP-ordered tests — it has simply not been interpreted through an optimal-range or systems-based lens.
- Ferritin around 30 µg/L — technically normal, yet frequently associated with fatigue, hair loss, and impaired thyroid function (18–20).
- Mildly elevated liver enzymes — which may reflect oxidative stress or metabolic burden rather than overt liver disease (21).
- Cholesterol patterns — which can provide insight into inflammation or thyroid status, not just cardiovascular risk (22).
For this reason, reviewing prior pathology is often the most efficient starting point before deciding whether additional investigations are warranted.
Frequently Asked Questions
If my blood tests are normal, could my symptoms still be physiological?
Yes. Standard blood tests are designed to detect overt disease rather than early, functional, or system-level dysfunction. Many physiological imbalances — including disrupted stress-hormone signalling, gut–immune interactions, nutrient insufficiencies, and inflammatory load — can affect how you feel without pushing markers outside laboratory reference ranges.
Does this mean my symptoms are “all in my head”?
No. Persistent symptoms with normal test results are rarely psychological in origin alone. Research shows that subclinical metabolic, immune, and neuroendocrine patterns can produce real, measurable symptoms even when conventional pathology appears unremarkable. The issue is often incomplete testing or interpretation, not imagined illness.
Should I repeat standard blood tests or look at them differently?
In many cases, reviewing existing blood work through an optimal-range and systems-based lens is more informative than repeating the same tests. Markers such as ferritin, thyroid indices, liver enzymes, and lipid patterns can provide valuable insight when interpreted in context with symptoms, lifestyle, and stress physiology.
What Happens Next
When underlying contributors are identified, care can move away from trial-and-error symptom management toward targeted, physiology-driven intervention. This may include nutritional repletion, gut-focused strategies, stress-hormone support, or lifestyle adjustments guided by objective data.
For many patients, this process also provides clarity and reassurance. Persistent symptoms are not a personal failing — they are often the result of measurable physiological patterns that have not yet been addressed.
Your Next Step
If you’ve been told you’re “fine” but continue to feel unwell, a deeper evaluation may be appropriate. A brief discovery call can help determine whether reviewing existing results or exploring functional investigations makes sense for your situation.
Feeling “fine” is not the same as functioning well — and understanding that distinction is often the first meaningful step forward.
REFERENCES
- Katayev A, et al. Clin Chim Acta. 2010.
- Wartofsky L, Dickey RA. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005.
- Andersen S, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002.
- Biondi B, Cooper DS. Lancet. 2008.
- Peeters RP. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017.
- Gershon MD. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013.
- Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012.
- Yano JM, et al. Cell. 2015.
- Adam EK, et al. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017.
- Fries E, et al. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009.
- Stover PJ. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009.
- Crider KS, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012.
- Newman MS, et al. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020.
- Lord RS, et al. Altern Med Rev. 2008.
- Lambrecht NJ, et al. Clin Biochem. 2012.
- Sweetman L. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013.
- Vipperla K, O’Keefe SJ. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016.
- Camaschella C. N Engl J Med. 2015.
- Beard JL. J Nutr. 2001.
- Zimmermann MB, et al. Thyroid. 2008.
- Sanyal AJ. Hepatology. 2011.
- Duntas LH. Thyroid. 2002.