Stop Playing Supplement Roulette: Why More Isn’t Always Better

Author: Rohan Smith | Functional Medicine Practitioner | Adelaide, SA

Supplement roulette mistakes happen when people take random vitamins or pills hoping for results, only to feel overwhelmed, frustrated, or no better at all. While supplements can be powerful tools when used correctly, indiscriminate use without testing, context, or personalised guidance often leads to wasted money and little benefit. In this article, we explore why more isn’t always better, how individual biology affects supplement response, and how evidence‑based strategies can help you choose what truly supports your health.

If you’re staring at a shelf full of pills, powders, and potions every morning and still not feeling any better, you’re not alone. I see it frequently in my Adelaide clinic: patients arrive exhausted and frustrated, often carrying bags filled with over 20 different supplements. Despite doing “all the right things,” their health hasn’t shifted—or worse, it has declined.

Quick Answer

Taking excessive supplements without diagnostic data often results in nutrient competition, where high doses of one mineral (such as zinc) may deplete another (such as copper) [1]. This “supplement roulette” approach can also create a metabolic burden on the liver and kidneys, mask underlying pathology, and contribute to biochemical imbalances [2]. Functional medicine prioritises testing rather than guessing—using blood, stool, and functional pathology to identify specific needs. By replacing a broad, unguided protocol with a minimal, targeted strategy, people may experience improvements in fatigue and digestive symptoms while reducing unnecessary supplement use [3].

The Risks of Random Supplementation

While the wellness industry promotes quick-fix ingredients, stacking multiple supplements without a strategy can backfire through several biological mechanisms:

• Nutrient competition: Many minerals share transport pathways. Excessive calcium may inhibit magnesium absorption, and high-dose iron may interfere with zinc uptake [4].
• Metabolic clearance: Every capsule and excipient must be processed by the liver and excreted by the kidneys. Excessive intake may contribute to subclinical hepatic stress in susceptible individuals [5].
• Bioavailability and form: Some supplements use poorly absorbed or synthetic forms (such as magnesium oxide or folic acid), which may limit effectiveness or interfere with active nutrient pathways [6].

Key Definitions

• Excipients: Inactive substances used as carriers for active ingredients in supplements.
• Cofactors: Vitamins or minerals required for enzymes to carry out biochemical reactions [7].
• Therapeutic window: The dosage range in which a nutrient may provide benefit without reaching toxicity.

Moving Beyond “Normal” Results

To reduce guesswork, advanced diagnostics are used to better understand individual needs:

• Nutrient mapping: Blood panels assessing vitamin B12, vitamin D, ferritin, and zinc-to-copper ratios [8].
• Organic Acids Testing (OAT): Evaluates metabolic by-products in urine that may indicate functional deficiencies in B vitamins and mitochondrial cofactors [9].
• Hormone panels (DUTCH): Assess cortisol patterns and hormone metabolites to determine whether so-called “adrenal” supplements are appropriate [10].
• Comprehensive Stool Analysis: Investigates whether malabsorption or gut dysbiosis may explain why supplements are not being absorbed effectively [11].

When “More” Caused Less

“Sarah” came to the clinic taking 25 different supplements daily and experiencing profound fatigue and brain fog.

Testing identified several contributing factors:

• High-dose zinc intake was associated with a significant copper deficiency, which may contribute to fatigue [12].
• Synthetic folic acid may have impaired utilisation of reduced folate forms in the context of MTHFR variants, potentially worsening cognitive symptoms [13].
• Multiple herbal “adrenal” blends appeared to overstimulate the nervous system, contributing to a “wired but tired” sleep pattern.

Following protocol simplification and targeted nutrient support based on testing, her energy levels were reported to improve over subsequent weeks.

When to Consider This Approach

You may benefit from reviewing your supplement routine if you experience:

• Supplement overload: Taking more than 5–10 products daily without a clear clinical rationale.
• Diminishing returns: Initial improvements followed by plateau or relapse of symptoms.
• New digestive issues: Bloating, nausea, or bowel changes that began after starting supplements.
• Persistent symptoms: Ongoing fatigue or chronic fatigue despite extensive supplementation.

Next Steps

• Audit your shelf: Bring all supplements to a consultation for professional review.
• Test, don’t guess: Functional pathology may help clarify which nutrients are relevant [16].
• Prioritise food first: Whole foods provide complex nutrient matrices that isolated supplements cannot replicate [17].
• Use a targeted strategy: When supplements are indicated, active and bioavailable forms may improve utilisation [18].

Key Insights

• More supplements are not always better; metabolic pathways have finite capacity.
• Nutrients act in balance—isolated, high-dose intake may disrupt that balance.
• Objective testing provides clarity that trial-and-error approaches often cannot.

Simplify Your Path to Health

If you are stuck in a supplement spiral and want clarity around what your body actually needs, a structured review may help. A targeted consultation within a functional medicine Adelaide setting focuses on evidence-informed testing and streamlined strategies, rather than guesswork.

References

1. Sandstead HH. Zinc deficiency: a public health problem? Am J Clin Nutr. 1995.
2. Ronco AL, et al. Dietary supplements and liver injury. Nutr Cancer. 2018.
3. Lord RS, Bralley JA. Laboratory Evaluations for Integrative and Functional Medicine. 2008.
4. Lönnerdal B. Dietary factors influencing zinc absorption. J Nutr. 2000.
5. García-Cortés M, et al. Hepatotoxicity by dietary supplements. Arch Toxicol. 2016.
6. Obeid R, et al. Folate metabolism and function. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013.
7. Kennedy DO. B vitamins and the brain. Nutrients. 2016.
8. Fairfield KM, Fletcher RH. Vitamins for chronic disease prevention. JAMA. 2002.
9. Lambrecht NJ, et al. Organic acids testing in clinical practice. Clin Biochem. 2012.
10. Newman MS, et al. Steroid hormone metabolism assessment. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020.
11. Vipperla K, O’Keefe SJ. Gut microbiota and malabsorption. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016.
12. Duncan A, et al. Copper deficiency due to zinc supplementation. J Clin Pathol. 2015.
13. Smith AD, et al. Folic acid and unmetabolised folate. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008.
14. National Institutes of Health. Dietary Supplement Fact Sheets.
15. Braun L, Cohen M. Herbs and Natural Supplements. 2015.
16. Han SH, et al. Functional testing in nutritional assessment. J Altern Complement Med. 2013.
17. Lichtenstein AH, Russell RM. Essential nutrients and whole foods. JAMA. 2005.
18. Werbach MR. Foundations of Nutritional Medicine. 1996.
19. Geller AI, et al. Emergency department visits for adverse events related to dietary supplements. N Engl J Med. 2015.
20. Kuszewski JC, et al. Bioavailability of mineral supplements. Nutrients. 2020.